?

Log in

intelligent design - Ilya Shlyakhter (notestaff) - letters to editors
May 27th, 2005
11:13 am

[Link]

Previous Entry Share Next Entry
intelligent design
Creative science

Creationists concede the credibility of science when they insist on teaching creationism as science and not religion or philosophy.

They adopt names like "creation science" in the hopes of riding the coattails of science to credibility, while rejecting the methods and assumptions that earned science this credibility in the first place.

If they want to use the name "science," they must use scientific standards. Those standards require that any scientific theory be testable and subject to being disproven. Creationism clearly does not make the cut.

Tags: , , ,

(1 comment | Leave a comment)

Comments
 
From:(Anonymous)
Date:January 18th, 2007 07:37 pm (UTC)

Creation science

(Link)
As science is unable to identify complete links that are not falsified it is wrong to identify evolution as the source of man evolving from an ape or monkey or other lower life form. The question, "is How is evolution able to be called science.?"
Ilya Shlyakhter Powered by LiveJournal.com